Let’s Get Real! Trump Against Big Evils
HUMOUR
From butt cracks to crack to cracks in the establishment, and while the world called him an a-hole, he brokered peace so CNN could dismiss it as Tyrant-friendly Trump simply cuddling up with big Dictators, just resolving a 60-year conflict ‘cause he’s reached desperations end hoping for votes.
This year, parties don’t matter; the Right is the Left and the left isn't right but also not wrong. The hippies chamomiled next-geners to over-Wokeness, making the peace-powered finger-wagging literati as caring and awake as highly-spiritual zombies. Defenders of free-speech smashed teeth to stop talks; whites widening white perception by delving deeper into the deepest pasty-pale whiteness of our whiter shade of pale-white guilt, which many opposed, but even clear-cut and irrefutable logic auto-Nazyified one's arse, slid you to the right of some left and lumped your kind with the rarely-seen backwoods übertrieben pork-raping and gun-lustitootin' folks with more swastikas on their faces then valid arguments in their heads. Goes without saying that hinting that, perhaps, maybe, possibly, Antifa & BLM engaged in more than peaceful reenactments of past and popular right-meets-right street clashes gives off a sniff that triggers wild Wokeness, and a desire to inflict whiteness-torture. Because Trump is big money whereas Bernie counters Wall Street and people are addicted to social media so Big Tech can save them from a lethal fentanyl overdose. Makes sense, no? Say it! Now let's go liberate life out of the racist, non-establishment-supporting, crony-intolerant non-nepotistic sister-humping, hate-spewing free-thinking-press-lapping fake-news whores of fascist-Nazi-scum Trumpeters calmly sitting against that tree, looking like they just wanna mind their own business. But don't be fooled by their jovial banter; they are the minions of QAnon, and their hatred of bark is palpable.
This isn't fiction. It's a moment, a slice of flipped-and-turned twisted Americana in the years just prior to what may someday be called: "Trump Against the People's Crony Communistic State of Capitalistic Socialization and Obamacare." Those watching CNN missed it, of course...
The Biden laptop story, whether assumed to be a real concern or hoax, is simply the elephant on top of the elephant in the room. No further references to it are made beyond this point.
It’s now a tautology: Anyone basing any opinion on anything filtered through anyone else cannot be said to have a valid opinion if it contains any absolutes; however, how can this ever be considered a fair, democratic election without a collective agreement on what constitutes reality, as per the following:
1. The President, The Man – Establishing An Objective Base Line
1.1 A Tyrant? A Fascist? No
Dangerous words used willy-nilly, being stripped of their original dangers, drowning their warnings in noise. For I should hope that overthrowing the US government takes more than Donald J. Trump. Prove me wrong, and I’ll listen. Is he an undiplomatic bully of sorts? He’s not just that, I’m sure, but we’re all ears.
1.2 A White-Supremacist-Loving Racist?
Sigh. I know. I, too, had been fooled.
1.3 Is Trump cleaning House, emptying the swamp and installing a clean pond, as promised? Could be
1.4 Hypocrite?! Can anyone deny that he himself isn’t crooked? Doubtful
Is it in a global-scheme, CIA-underhanded way, though, or in a greased-palm, Manhattan-Real-estate-bully kind of way, whereby back-alleys and shady bars make good work-related meeting places, and often, unfortunately, involves micro-aggression of sorts, albeit not the macro-militaristic corporatized-colonization-in-the-guise-of-intervention we’ve been sold as normal and necessary? Whether it befits one’s conceptual ideal of US President or gets things done in ¼ the usual time is a subjective aspect, I guess, however, despite a few bangs, nothing yet substantiates the idea that Trump belongs to the Bomb-Lovin’ Gang we’ve mostly known.
1.5 He's a failed business man! That’s fair
But he’s still wealthier than at least the 99% who’ll call him that, which he’s accomplished within a system that legalizes despicable business aspects; none of that mattered re Bush, Cheney, et al.
KEEP IN MIND: Trump’s shady deals are tiny crumbs created by the larger cake reserved to Bankers & Co., and out of which a Wall-Street-conformant President usually pops out. It’s not about lesser evils, it’s about fair, proper perspective.
And, within the world in which it occurs and corruption is now normalized, is playing “the game” amongst those who’ve agreed to play it—intent and goal notwithstanding—not better than doing so with those one governs, playing out corruption in a manner that’s done tremendous harm to many, globally, while delivering tremendous wealth and real freedom to so very few?
1.6 Intent & Competency ?
Basal psychology tells us that Trump is more likely to want to please the country, show it he’s the best, then betray it. But this is all vaguery, and the seeds of mistrust towards the government far-predate the Trump years, and, given what we know of Trump...
Trump is already rich. So? Don’t people usually complain the rich just wanna get richer? Unless foreign dignitaries stay at a Trump Whatever because he’s offering rates that benefit tax payers, well, that kinda proves my point. Real estate versus illegal arms deals and installing new, open-market-friendly governments… Gradual steps. Conversely, be honest, how relevant is his paternal seed fund other than to keep him grounded? Nonetheless:
The notion of Donald J. Trump as a chosen Philosopher King is disturbing; it suggests that:
> Nations have developed under an erroneous definition of wisdom;
> Life, in the most absurd of Kierkegaardian Absurdity, is truly absurd;
> We need a new word; “Irony” isn’t sufficient to capture the irony at play;
> "The Good Place” isn’t a sitcom, it’s the news (which has become the sitcom).
(Couldn’t help it.) We can all agree: President Trump is skilled at certain forms of business, and, though not a “savior” in any expected manner, isn’t it about time that someone approached government with a cost-effective, streamlining, and bloated-Bureaucratic-BS-eliminating, Crony-ridding mindset? Which requires the balls and thick-headedness demonstrated by the kind of politicians which, today, can only be found in history books that praise them, whereas most recent ones belong in jail.
1.7 An easy man to deal with? Doubtful.
1.8 A refreshing break from political double-speak and governmental gobbledygook? LOL!
Although both well-intended and the product of personal flaws, he speaks in hyperbole while a President must express non-superlative reality. Here’s an actual and unnecessary challenge to all, but focusing on the non-accuracies it naturally produces, undiscerningly labelling each as a lie for the public, even limiting the scope or frame and lying if necessary, is childish and unproductive. Sadly, given the persistence and too many of the examples given, adult and intelligent aren’t words I’d readily associate with those efforts. Unless we’ve all become too smart to understand one another… or there’s more going on than we know?
All of the above pertains to aspects all voters should be clear on. “Intent & Competency” is still an unsatisfactory blank. The institutions we’re told to trust have done too much to contradict the narrative they present as factual. Democracy cannot exist under such conditions.
2. Government
During the 2016 pre-election campaign to this day, from the three impeachment attempts through to refusing to give a “yes” on a stimulus bill, and more, the previous administration and the establishment’s hindrances and meddling against the Trump administration, has been, and is, intentionally deceitful, harmful, and unnecessarily costly on tax payers. More are available, but these two examples should amply suffice:
1. Russiagate 2. Use of intelligence assets to spy on the Trump campaign ( 3. Pelosi )
Details of point 1, along with what follows, clearly establishes Trump as an anti-ol’-school-establishment figure, not an anti-establishment figure per se. Considering the political backdrop of the last 40 years, is this really a bad thing? Crony Capitalism bankrupted the US while killing the middle class; who profited?
Is Trump really nothing short of a grifter now operating in a political world that’s suddenly turned morally good and people-concerned, funded by good Wall Street & non-evil-guaranteed Big Tech money?
Oh, wait! I was forgetting about the Russians! Those Russians. Takes me back to the 80s.
Taking all into account, are we to believe that all institutional push-back is explainable under what constitutes normal human reaction to changes in one’s comfortable habits? Some truth to that, no doubt, but given the two examples I provided, above, are we to assume that’s just a manifestation of psychopathic normalcy? Change typically leads to frame-ups and impeachments? Wow. Talk about playing hardball!
Trump represents one of two possible paths within one of two factual realities; the truth, however, is contained within just one. The game is up! There is an agenda. But the waters are so murky that refractional distortion has managed to flip parts of society, ditto for definitions applied to popular politics and their movements. But where is the source of light?
If certain corporate and establishment entities had not weighed-down his administration for at least three of its four years, if he’d received fair treatment rather than thrown in an hostile, anti-patriotic, paranoia-seeding environment, how much of government would have been reformed, paving the way for a proverbial clean pond? Providing, of course, Trump is well surrounded and given no reason to doubt anyone in his admin; a two-way street, for sure.
Are dysfunctional institutions that sacred? Over the value of citizens and their rights? Which is the progressive side and which is the conservative one? Is a return to the Crony Establishment, with its history of lies, its shameful lack of transparency (true, Twitter, is fairly recent, but...), and its cozy-comfort with the morally-bankrupt Wall Street filth that backs them, the people who offer tremendous change forward through freedom-regression tactics, including a dictatorial application of free-speech that's expressed by censoring their opponents' perceived promotions of free speech, is that the progressive side???
3. Vice-President Joe Biden’s nomination
This still confuses many. It seems far from farfetched to assume that, either through targeted negotiation or persuasion applied during a closed-door meeting, Biden was imposed on the party; he never represented a collective decision. Why? That “best shot” angle seems contrived.
Was the conflation of disproved collusion and very real interference, and the subsequent Russian confusion still rippling on the surface of the obscure waters maintained, if not also created, by MSM for the Dems, seen as an ideal given the non-scandalous scandal status that could now be conferred upon it, providing all could be presented in a manner that pumped hatred, if not against one another, certainly against the President and anyone who sided with him?
The timeline and impeachment allegations hold little weight without having established, a year prior to his actual nomination, a high degree of certainty that Joe Biden would be President Trump’s opposite in the 2020 elections.
Statistically, the many overlaps between the impeachment causes and procedures, and the presidential candidates, should only occur in a movie, be it Netflix or Hollywood.
Why would the Dems expose themselves to any risks or scandals relating to this? Did the dotty “Ol’ Working-Man Joe” score through the roof with the market-research team, making the apple-pie-and-the-American-Dream image the only one that spat out their desired outcome in some predictability model?
Are we to infer that all hinged on the assumption that the American people are fools that can be easily filled with hate beyond all logic, or was it based on supreme arrogance and an embarrassing undervaluation of their cover-up efforts? Or are the Bidens and the US the victims of a master stroke by a formidable strategist, A.K.A. Trump?
Leveraging $1B to have someone fired, which other governmental authorities, including the one doing the firing, wanted to have fired (as the 25-Jul transcripts indicates), seems kind of ludicrous when all it took was a simple, regular dismissal. But if it’s in Wikipedia, must be true?
4. The US mainstream media (MSM) & Big Tech (BT)
Their handling of the entire Trump administration has been disconcertingly contentiously biased, intentionally deceitful and harmful, hence, ultimately, very dangerous and deserving of our fear. How can any outlet defend against this claim when easily-countered op-ed now defines absolutely all their news?
This exposes, fully, grandiosely, that US citizens were not given a fair, accurate, and complete picture.
The MSM have placed great effort on painting a false narrative by unforgivingly amplifying the President’s real foibles and personal flaws, no matter how small, while refusing to highlight any of President Trump’s positive accomplishments—research leads me to conclude that, for the people, Trump has done more good than evil when contrasted against the last 40 years, but no one is allowed to acknowledge this.
All news is now op-ed. True journalism is dead; clicks matter more than facts; page views precede policies; politics is a game of likes. Revenue is communication.
Until I had reason to dig for concrete facts re Trump (which I’m far from sure I’ve found, the info landscape consisting of more crap than pollution), I was a staunch anti-Trumper—how could I not be?
I’m now a staunch anti-Bidenist! My reasons have nothing to do with person or party; they are based on rationality, one that adheres to all that individuals have clamored for, publicly declaring it to the world during “Occupy”.
But can we be sure?
Why? Because. The real question is: What is it that we're unsure of being sure about? Don't forg[-----------CENSORED-------------]k you.
Can we therefore conclude that ‘real’ politicians and the media jointly agree that pleasing the people—what elitists tend to disdain as “populism”—is an evil thing? Thus, this justifies a behaviour few wouldn’t otherwise hesitate to categorize under “evil”? But if all benefited of the same Ivy-League education as elitists, would “populism” still be bad?
I do concede that such an approach offers real dangers, the present state of welfare and education, and level of ignorance imposed on all by the media certainly showcase real efforts to prove that populism cannot be trusted and must be avoided; doesn’t this outlook hearken back far worse atrocities, brought on by the tyranny this inevitably leads to, if history matters (other than to pile-on evidence to prove that no one pays attention to history until it's too late. Or you've reached that unavoidable vortex of divergent discourse when one... Come to think of, is that still true? These days, there's hardly time for a hello before the words Nazi, fascist, Klan, white-supremacist and Alex-Jones-Joy-Boy are hurled... which, now that I'm looking at it, makes my whole history question dumb or moot, since it's become tolerable to see or hear of Muslims, Africans, Poles or Jews being viciously labeled "Hitler" by the justifiably-moral social-healers that can be found on the left of anything they find too right.). Sigh.
Obviously, the 1% view of “meritocracy” is anything but that since the elitist starting point involves social connections and standings and top money for top tutors, as well as legacy privileges in all ivy-league schools. To be compared and deemed of higher merit, a child from a low-income family—skills and brains on equal par—needs to have far greater level of self-discipline, problem-solving skills, and, yes, determination.
Having done their all to remove a populist president that was aiming to deliver more to working class families while blowing a wad on them instead of Wall Street, the 1% mentions meritocracy simply to shift blame, pervert rational anger into self-guilt. And I'm going off topic, aren't I? Well, off the scope of this post; I'll agree on that.
The MSM, and the sometimes-overly-reactionary right-wing media (albeit they've mostly been on the defensive), have been manufacturing hate and division, crystallizing a polarization, doing so through omissions and misleading frames of reference, forced ambiguity, stat misrepresentation and skewed data, deceptive soundbites, plain lies, a non-stop barrage of one-sided views, and other means, all in thanks to digital, which I’ll skip over, finding satisfaction in the fact that any allusion to certain practices forces some, at the vey least, to revisit the disgust they wrestled and rationalized upon entering and producing for that world, still finding themselves doing so.
Trump made it easy to draw MSM’s hate, no argument here, but how does this possibly entail an anything-goes, activist-meets-Gonzo journalism that demands throwing the highest ratio of smears-per-minute the world has ever seen, then act as if MSM had been justified, anchors' moaning their indignation and insisting it's Trump dishonesty, for we're all powerless saps who'll forget in a few weeks, go back to getting our news from MSNBC, CNN, Washington Post, et al., which Big Tech facilitated, no matter what the A.I. supposedly tells us; I’ve documented far too many examples for this to be denied.
Meh. How many went to jail, and who paid, for the too-big-to-fail home-heist hubris of 2008 and the very big failure of superbly rich lawyers and today's policy makers? The very same establishment douches that people want to run back to, not even willing to look past the haze that mainstream media kept fabricating.
The last few weeks of the election have been nothing but a constant onslaught of negatives against the President; the instant one was debunked, five more would appear, and the debunked one slated to be re-rolled out a few more times. This can't simply be about Trump hate! Can the establishment media really be that contemptuous of their audiences?
Meanwhile, with the World Economic Forum doing everything it can to accelerate our return to nothingness, whether financial or otherwise is still up for grabs...
Can President Trump save the Supermart & SuperSaver? Is he in on the Obama Sin-Biden super scheme? Or does he have a dastardly supreme deception of his own to dolly up? Does Dolly know Karen? Will Trump take down the Bezos-Musk swarm of satellites, thus allowing mankind to explore space and his three moon casinos freely?
And what about that laptop? (I know. I lied. But I'm honest about it.) It would appear that the CCP encouraged a strategic meeting for HB, or hook-up, allowing swift and damaging penetration by one of the Party People’s foreign-female-financial-fornicator-for-finest-foot-fetishists (i.e. hooker with clean feet).
2020 has a good side: Never again! A tautology, for sure, but worth reaffirming. Yet, for all we know, 2021 may be worse.
We’re so very far from the end. The story, I mean. Not sure about the rest.
.
